Rebecca Auer is a surgical oncologist and director of cancer research at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.
Canadians diagnosed with cancer are being failed by our country’s clinical trials system. I know this as a cancer surgeon and researcher, but also as the spouse of someone thriving despite having advanced-stage cancer. My spouse has been able to access molecular testing, experimental therapies and enrolment in a clinical trial abroad – at personal expense.
While unprecedented innovations in research have led to an explosion of novel cancer treatments – including molecular, immuno-oncology and cell therapies – there have been almost no changes in the way we run clinical trials and approve new therapies for public funding in Canada.
This outdated approach hurts cancer patients. With so many new treatments coming down the therapeutic pipeline, it is critical that we transform the process for testing, approving and funding therapies, so the increasing number of Canadians diagnosed with cancer each year can benefit.
Clinical trials are often the best or the only treatment option for cancer patients, offering novel therapies that may have fewer side effects and better efficacy than traditional treatments – and that would otherwise be inaccessible or unaffordable to most Canadians.
Canada plans to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040 – and we have the tools to do it
Participating in clinical research also gives patients hope.
According to a new report from CONECTed, a network of oncology patient groups, Health Canada regulations around trial design and monitoring are complicated and outdated, creating complexity and delays in initiating and completing trials. This discourages sponsors from opening trials in Canada, and investigators from initiating these trials at their cancer centres.
A lack of molecular testing in Canada compounds the problem.
For many cancer clinical trials, patients need to have molecular testing on their tumour to determine if their cancer harbours the mutated gene the trial therapy is targeting. Unfortunately, no province funds comprehensive molecular testing, and a recent report from the coalition Access to Genomic Testing states that most provinces are wholly unprepared to provide it, even if funding were available.
That leaves it up to cancer patients to pay for these costly tests themselves. For many, the $2,000-to-$5,000 price tag is simply unaffordable, leaving them unable to participate in a trial. This also discourages industry trials from even being offered in Canada because it is too challenging to find specific patients who meet the eligibility criteria.
Even when trials are open in Canada, they are often only available at one or two large-volume cancer centres. The burdensome regulatory Health Canada framework makes it too onerous and costly to open a clinical trial site that can only expect to enroll a couple of patients. While delegated or virtual treatment is acceptable for clinical care, it is not allowed for the oversight of clinical trial patients. As a result, cancer patients wishing to take part must travel to the location of the trial, which may be costly and inconvenient – or inaccessible.
To fix Canada’s crumbling health care system, we need better tools than duct tape
Adding to these barriers is a mindset among government and hospital leaders that research should be viewed as separate from clinical care. While this perspective is grounded in efforts to ensure patient safety, this separation is now creating obstacles for patients to access the best available cancer care.
Fixing the system will require policy and practice changes at the federal, provincial and hospital levels.
The federal government must implement new ways of designing and administering clinical trials. While there must be no compromise on safety, there is room to imagine a system that is faster, more efficient and more cost-effective, as well as being geographically accessible to all Canadians.
Canada should have a single, centralized research ethics board that reviews the ethical conduct, safety and privacy considerations of a clinical trial. Cancer centres should be allowed to form networks that enable them to operate as “single sites” for clinical trial administration and patient enrolment, alongside virtual options for participation. These changes would encourage sponsors to open trials in Canada and make it easier for patients to enroll at any site on a network’s list, enabling them to access clinical trials closer to home.
Provincial governments must also be forward-thinking in their approach to funding molecular and other diagnostic tests, supporting not just the proven targets of yesterday, but also those being evaluated in clinical trials today, many of which will define future therapies.
Hospitals must also embrace a culture of research and be incentivized to engage in clinical trials. Hospital leaders must recognize the value of research and integrate it into their care paradigms and deliverables, so more patients have access to innovative cancer treatments.
Cancer patients do not have the luxury of time. We need to transform all aspects of the clinical trials system now, so that patients have the opportunity to participate and live with hope on their side.